Skip to content

Chappaqua Poison

The Painter of Cottages

AUTHOR CASE_FILES
Chapter banner for The Painter of Cottages

The days got longer and then shorter and the fog kept its schedule and the house on Vermont Street stopped feeling like a place where something bad was happening and started feeling like a house again.

Kelly came back.

Or he came back to Kelly. The sequence was gentle enough that the distinction no longer mattered. He saw her at a tech event — one of the gatherings where San Francisco’s industry reconvenes periodically to remind itself that it exists. She was there. He was there. The ghosting had left a gap, but the gap had the quality of something unfinished rather than something broken.

They talked.

He told her about the hospital. He told her about the doctor. He told her about the distance to New York. Kelly did not tell him he was right, and she did not tell him he was crazy. She listened without rushing to fill the silences, without offering the kind of advice that is really just a person trying to fix something so they don’t have to sit with it.

They started seeing each other again.

On weekends they drove out of the city. North, usually — past Marin, past the vineyards, up into the hills where the land opened up and the houses got further apart and the air thinned out the way air does at elevation.

There was a ranch.

It had belonged to Thomas Kinkade — the painter of cottages, the man who had made a fortune painting light. Kinkade had died years earlier and the ranch had passed through hands and become a place where people could stay, a retreat with horses and quiet and the particular emptiness of a property that had been built to hold one man’s vision of what beauty looked like.

Steve and Kelly went there on a Saturday.

The land was gold and green in long, quiet slopes. The hills rolled in long curves toward a horizon that was just blue sky and more hills. Horses stood motionless in the fields. The barn was old and clean and smelled like hay and leather.

They walked the property in the late afternoon. Kelly’s hand was in his. The light was the kind of light that Kinkade had painted — warm, specific, landing on surfaces the way light lands when you’re paying attention to it.

“This is nice,” Kelly said.

It was.


In February 2018, Amazon acquired Ring for more than a billion dollars.

Jamie Siminoff personally netted roughly three hundred million.

Steve’s 205,308 stock options were now worth real money. On paper. In early April, his financial advisor contacted Ring to exercise the options. Ring’s general counsel, Leila Rouhi, refused. The options, she wrote, had been forfeited — thirty days after Steve’s offer to resign from the board on October 31, 2016.

This was the same Leila Rouhi who, on November 3, 2017 — more than a year after the board resignation — had emailed Steve to “send the patent stuff.” He had complied, executing the patent assignments in March 2018, weeks before the Amazon acquisition closed. He had done so believing what Ring’s conduct had represented: that he was still earning option rights for his ongoing service.

Ring had asked for his patents. Ring had gotten his patents. Then Ring said the options were gone.

The transmittal documents from Amazon required a general release of all claims. Sign here, release everything, and you get paid. Steve’s advisors asked for a carve-out — a way to preserve his claims while accepting the acquisition payout.

Ring’s outside counsel, Roxana Azizi, wrote back: “The transmittal documentation is required by the merger agreement and cannot be modified. Even if the documents could be modified, we are not willing to carve out or exclude any claims.”

Sign everything. Or get nothing.

He didn’t sign.

On July 6, 2018, Steve wrote Jamie a short email.

“J — Sorry I didn’t call you but I have been a little busy. Tara took the baby and ran off to NY after it was discovered she had done something very bad for which there is now a criminal investigation underway in SF.”

To a man sitting inside a billion-dollar Amazon acquisition, the email did not read like a plea from a partner. It read like a liability.

But it should have stopped him. No matter how much you love your wife, you will love your son a million times more. Jamie had said that on a porch in Nantucket, and he had meant it, and it was true. If he had read this email through the lens of that belief — a father whose baby had just been taken, a man living the nightmare that Jamie himself had told him was the worst thing imaginable — the email would have changed everything. It would have explained the years of difficulty, the refusal to join Ring, the impossible behavior that Jamie had been forced to reinterpret as betrayal.

But the pressure of the acquisition, the money, the frustration — all of it had already done its work. Jamie had already converted Steve from friend to obstacle. And the email from a father whose child had been kidnapped arrived at the desk of a man who could no longer afford to see it for what it was.

He told Jamie he was prioritizing Evie.

On August 27, Steve wrote to his advisor Sean Snyder: “this is exactly what we needed. We are going ahead with the law suit against Jamie now.”

On November 1, 2018, Steve filed a complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court. Case number 18SMC00162. Russell v. Ring LLC and Jamie Siminoff. Fourteen counts. Breach of written contract. Breach of oral contract. Fraud. Patent rescission. Unjust enrichment.

The complaint noted that some of Ring’s misconduct was “the result of personal animus … in retaliation for Russell raising concerns about Ring’s conduct, including … Ring’s failure to properly protect its customers’ privacy.”

Steve had warned Jamie about sending all video feeds to Ukraine without adequate privacy protections. Jamie hadn’t listened. Years later, the FTC would investigate Ring for those exact failures. But by then Jamie had the money and the company and the Amazon deal, and Steve had a complaint and a settlement and the knowledge that the architecture he’d designed to protect privacy had been gutted by the man he’d helped build it for.

Kelly helped with the case.

This was new. This was different from what had come before. Tara had been the source of legal crisis — the poisoning, the hospitalization, the custody emergency. Kelly was the opposite. She helped organize, she helped fight, she helped Steve see the Ring case through to settlement in February 2019. Winning anything against Amazon was itself a thing. The settlement preserved Prism’s claims.

It was the first legal win. It would not be the last. And the fact that Kelly was there for it — that the productive relationship started here, with this fight, with this win — would matter for everything that came after.

But that was later.

On that Saturday at the Kinkade ranch, none of it had happened yet. The options hadn’t been deleted. The baby hadn’t been kidnapped. The complaint hadn’t been filed. The settlement hadn’t been reached.

The light on the hills was real. The horses were real. Kelly’s hand in his was real. The painter of cottages was dead but the ranch was still there and the light was still the same light and Steve stood in it and let it be enough for that moment.

Machine Summary
Chapter
B13 — The Painter of Cottages
Act
Act II — Meeting Tara (2017-2019)
Summary
Kelly comes back. A ranch that belonged to the painter of cottages. Light on the hills. Then Amazon buys Ring, Jamie deletes the options, and Steve files a fourteen-count complaint. Kelly helps him win.
Evidence Confidence Score
78/100
Tags
2017, 2018, Amazon, Jamie Siminoff, Kelly Turnure, Kinkade Ranch, Ring, San Francisco
Related Chapters
B10, B30, B34