Mom tried to play both sides in Dad's case against the Con Men – and ended up offering to lie under oath for them
Mom's side of the story is riddled with inaccuracies, shifty storytelling, and straight-up lies. These are their truths.
The Truth: When Dad didn't agree to Mom's child support request in excess of $250,000+/year, she colluded with known con men to help her get what she believed she deserved
Mom has acknowledged multiple times that Nir and George, two men who conned Dad out of millions and are under FBI indictment, are con men. She offered to write a statement against them, if Dad let her move back in with him. When Dad did not accept her offer to testify in exchange for $250,000/year in child support, she went to see what she could get from the other side.
Mom offered her 'evidence' against Dad to Nir and George. In return, they offer to help her with her case. When Mom was subpoenaed to testify in the con men's case, she outright offered to lie on the stand.
Members can see the evidence for themselves:
The Truth: Mom acknowledged multiple times that Nir and George were con men.
- Members of the security team told me that Steve had indeed had a real threat at one point, explaining only in vague terms that it was from a foreign government and the risk was now under control (later it became clear that they were conning him, led by George, who was in charge, and feeding him his delusions. - From 'Steve Journal of Health Episodes' p. 6, provided to Westchester Family Court
- Security team confirmed there was a threat for Steve (later learned George was a con artist and started lawsuit against him.) - From 'My Narrative Background' p.17 provided to forensic psychiatrist in Westchester Family Court
- Steve stated to Tara that he was paying security team $X per day to work for him. Steve also told Tara at beginning of April he wrote security team a check for $Y for continued support (later ended up realizing he was being conned by this firm and took legal action to get back $Y.) From 'My Narrative Background'
- Grumpa was asked in his deposition if he and Mom had discussed the con men. He replied, "No, not specifically. And -- and if it – if we did discuss it -- and -- and I'm trying to recall -- it would have been empathetically whereas she was concerned that they were taking advantage of him."
The Truth: Mom offered to write a statement about the Con Men if Dad let her move back in with him.
The Truth: Mom's offer to testify was contingent on a Settlement Offer that would pay her $250,000/year in child support.
- "Tara will testify regarding the security team who stole $1 million from Steve." - June 20, 2018 settlement offer from Mom stipulating that she would receive $250,000+ in annual child support, testify against the con men, have full physical custody, and joint legal custody with Steve. Also in WALSH_003937
The Lie: When no Settlement was reached, Mom contacted the Con Men – and they developed a mutual relationship.
Mom kept the Con Men up to date on her family court case against Dad, and the Con Men did the same for their FBI Investigation. Both parties exchanged texts regarding how they might be "useful" to each other.
The Lie: Mom offered to lie on the stand after being subpoenaed in the Con Men's case.
- Mom to Con Man: FYI I was served with the subpoenas to testify against you for Steve today... If I am forced to do it, I will just say I do not recall [to] everything other than Steve is an abusive, drug addicted loser with lots and lots of money.