SLE-051: The Lies: "Evie had suspicious bruises after her visit with Dad"

The Lies: "Evie had suspicious bruises after her visit with Dad"

Mom's side of the story is riddled with inaccuracies, shifty storytelling, and straight-up lies. Her family's history of behavior reveals a much darker truth.

The Truth: The bruise Mom reported were normal, but Dad noticed other concerning bruises.

Mom reported suspicious bruises to Evie's court-appointed attorney after a visit with Dad. Evie's attorney, Jennifer Jackman, noted that a bruise on the shin wasn't unusual for a child.

However, both Dad and the court-appointed Supervisor noticed numerous other bruises of a more concerning nature.

A diagram of the suspicious bruises that Dad noticed after a visit.

Members can see the evidence for themselves:

Evidence & Context

Timeline

March 13–15, 2019 Russell requested FaceTime access Evie
April 11, 2019 Memorandum attorney Russell court rules
March 23, 2019 Russell supervisor arrived at visit
April 9, 2019 Following court appearance April 3
April 13–15, 2019 Russell formally documented continued denial visitation
April 16, 2019 Russell California attorney detailed response AFC

Supporting Documents

2019 3 27 Tara Temp Order of Protection
Master Binder Russell Motions with Proposed Orders
Deposition Brie Walsh P47
00254838
Russell Memo re Supervisor Report 00266785
05 13 19 Russell DeclarationDraft
OTSC legal fees
Civil Rico Service Subpoenas for Depos

Editor's Note

Context added by editor
Claims and contradictions described in this post can be cross-referenced against sworn testimony, text message compilations, and court transcripts in the evidence archive.